Real World Speed
Performance profile from 62,904 user samples
9,137 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB
Worst Bench: 61% EVGA(3842 3888) 3GB
Poor: 61% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 547
53,767 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 72% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 547
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71.4 % -39% 99.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+39%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps -22% 325 fps Better texture detail.
+22%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps -20% 193 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
218 fps -33% 289 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+33%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
114 fps -75% 199 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+75%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
306 fps -25% 383 fps Better peak texture detail.
+25%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
178 fps -22% 217 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
247 fps -34% 330 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+34%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps -82% 229 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+82%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps -60% 254 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+60%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
105 fps -14% 120 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+14%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63.4 fps -53% 97.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+53%
Market Share
Based on 5,444,721 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.19 % -479% 1.1 % Hugely higher market share.
+479%
Value
Value For Money
66.3 % -13% 74.9 % Slightly better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % -48% 108 % Much more popular.
+48%
Price
Price (score)
$410 Cheaper.
+27%
$560 -27%
Age
Newest
47 Months -38% 29 Months Much more recent.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps -75% 401 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+75%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
189 fps -71% 324 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+71%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
204 fps -59% 325 fps Much better lighting effects.
+59%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
168 fps -70% 286 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $299Nvidia GTX 1070 $386Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $508Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $920SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback