Real World Speed
Performance profile from 164,575 user samples
144,453 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3232)
Poor: 69% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 625
20,122 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% EVGA(3842 3888) 3GB
Worst Bench: 55% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
Poor: 55% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.8 % Faster effective speed.
60.8 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
328 fps Better texture detail.
269 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
194 fps Faster multi rendering.
162 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
291 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
223 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps Much faster complex splatting.
112 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
376 fps Better peak texture detail.
302 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
175 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
321 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
248 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
123 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
173 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
86 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
60 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Better LoL Fps.
170 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
105 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
64 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
49 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
114 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Better WoW Fps.
73 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,713,451 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.57 % Hugely higher market share.
0.09 %
Value For Money
38.9 % Slightly better value.
35.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Much more popular.
78 %
Price (score)
$480 $410 Slightly cheaper.
54 Months More recent.
72 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
364 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
225 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
317 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
185 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps Much better lighting effects.
201 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
286 fps Much better reflection handling.
168 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback