Average Bench: 6.48% (236th of 542)

Based on 604 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0E3A Model: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 3000M averaged 93.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 19.6fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 19.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is just 6.65%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 3000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 20.4fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 24.2fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 604 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.5 Lighting 19.8 22.5
3.6 Reflection 20.4 22.7
1.2 Parallax 16.6 22.9
5.5% 18.9 fps
Min Avg Max
3.6 MRender 19.6 21.6
3.6 Gravity 24.2 27.6
4.2 Splatting 20.1 21.9
10.2% 21.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.99
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 19.8
6% 21.4 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 21.4
11% 21.3 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 19.8
6% 21.3 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 21.3
11% 21.3 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.56
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 19.8
6% 21.3 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 21.5
11% 21.5 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.11
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 19.5
6% 21.1 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21
Splatting 21.2
11% 21.1 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 19.6
6% 21.2 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 21.3
11% 21.1 fps
Dell(1028 14A4) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7735
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 6.7
4% 15.7 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 21.3
11% 21.3 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.81
Lighting 22
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 19.8
6% 21.4 fps
604 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 4,075,880 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 604 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 1630) 50% 7% ± 2%
Dell(1028 04A4) 31% 7% ± 2%
Dell(1028 14A4) 15% 5% ± 2%
HP(103C 0851) 2% 7% ± 1%
Fujitsu(10CF 1633) 1% 5% ± 3%
Clevo(1558 7101) 0% 12% ± 0%
HP(103C 176C) 0% 7% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 5102) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 3000M Builds (Compare 380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $450

Popular Quadro 3000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 37 pages, please contribute.


542 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $225Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback