Average Bench: 3.54% (375th of 630)

Based on 4,082 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DFA Model: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 1000M averaged 96.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 11.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 12.2fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is just 2.77%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 1000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 12fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 9.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,082 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.68 Lighting 11.6 13.1
3.7 Reflection 12 13.4
1.98 Parallax 9.1 12
3.03% 10.9 fps
Min Avg Max
3.9 MRender 12 13
3.9 Gravity 12.2 13.7
2.5 Splatting 6.69 7.92
3.6% 10.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Lighting 12
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 5.9
3% 10.2 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 7.2
4% 11.3 fps
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 5.9
3% 9.97 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 7.1
4% 11.3 fps
Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.56
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 11.3
3% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 7.1
4% 11.2 fps
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.98
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 11.3
3% 12.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 7.1
4% 11.2 fps
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 11.2
3% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 7.1
4% 11.1 fps
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 11.2
3% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 7.1
4% 11 fps
Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.56
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 1.2
1% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 2.4
1% 3.63 fps
4,082 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,625,019 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 4,082 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 1631) 36% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 21D1) 22% 3% ± 1%
Dell(1028 04A3) 14% 4% ± 1%
Dell(1028 14A3) 13% 3% ± 1%
Fujitsu(10CF 1632) 6% 3% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 21CF) 5% 3% ± 1%
HP(103C 0854) 3% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 1630) 0% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04A4) 0% 4% ± 0%
Dell(1028 153E) 0% 1% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 1000M Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $316

Popular Quadro 1000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

3 months ago.

consider it was released in 2010-2011 is still perform acceptable for demandings of these days


Your
opinion?
630 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback