Real World Speed
Performance profile from 51,630 user samples
46,082 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 256% Gigabyte(1458 4100) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 208% MSI(1462 E130)
Poor: 208% Great: 256%
SPEED RANK: 6th / 714
5,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 293% XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 216% PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 216% Great: 293%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
240 % 257 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
347 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
327 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
349 fps 435 fps Better reflection handling.
+25%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
480 fps 519 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
299 fps 303 fps +1%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
376 fps 392 fps +4%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
472 fps 520 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+10%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
509 fps 578 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
317 fps 335 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 67,392,694 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.62 % Hugely higher market share.
+575%
0.24 %
Value
Value For Money
83.5 % Much better value.
+37%
60.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
93 % Much more popular.
+63%
57 %
Price
Price (score)
$680 Much cheaper.
+32%
$1,000
Age
Newest
15 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
16 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
415 fps 848 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+104%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps 502 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+121%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
370 fps 761 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+106%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
215 fps 460 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+114%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 4070-Ti is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 7,680 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.6 GHz, 12 GB of memory, a 192-bit memory bus, 60 3rd gen RT cores, 240 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 285W and an MSRP of $800 USD. The 4070-Ti is around 50% faster than the 3070-Ti and offers similar performance to the 3090-Ti at less than half the price. Since the 4070-Ti only has 12GB-192-bit memory (vs 24GB-384-bit in the 3090-Ti) it is relatively weaker (5-10%) at 4K. Users tempted to consider the 7900 XT/X by AMD’s army of sponsored Advanced Marketers (youtube, reddit, twitter, forums etc.) should be aware that AMD have a history of releasing benchmark busting, heavily marketed, sub standard products. Although the 7900 XTX does outperform the 4070-Ti on paper, the 4070-Ti is more power efficient (quieter), has a broader feature set (RT/DLSS 3.0) and offers far better game compatibility (drivers). PC gamers still looking to join AMD’s “2%” GPU club (Steam stats: 5000/6000 series combined mkt share) need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote inferior products. Most gamers, who are best off playing at 1080p, should wait for the upcoming, better value, 4060 series cards. Shoppers looking for more affordable options in the near term should consider the previous gen 3060-Ti, which offers excellent real-world performance for $400 USD. [Jan '23 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback