CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
245 EFps +4% 236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+23%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
119 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+21%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
117 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+24%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+12%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 307,429 user samples
240,599 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Gigabyte(1458 3FC0) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% EVGA(3842 2060)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 642
66,830 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 77% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 642
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
84.6 % 85.1 % +1%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
340 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
290 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
282 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+55%
182 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
290 fps 325 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
378 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
352 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
309 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+62%
191 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
315 fps 369 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+17%
Market Share
Based on 32,999,089 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.5 % Hugely higher market share.
+900%
0.25 %
Value
Value For Money
63.8 % Better value.
+25%
51 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
156 % Much more popular.
+33%
117 %
Price
Price (score)
$314 Cheaper.
+21%
$395
Age
Newest
20 Months Much more recent.
+46%
37 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
320 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+34%
238 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
393 fps 567 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
204 fps 302 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+48%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
291 fps Much better reflection handling.
+30%
223 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
345 fps 484 fps Much better texture detail.
+40%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
185 fps 287 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+55%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback