Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
245 EFps +4% 236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+23%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
119 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+21%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
117 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+24%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+12%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 737,213 user samples
645,160 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Asus(1043 868E)
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 3755)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 77th / 713
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
89.8 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
78 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
113 fps Better lighting effects.
+15%
98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
118 fps Better reflection handling.
+12%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+49%
88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
99.1 fps 114 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
124 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
164 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+46%
112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+49%
94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps 128 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 68,667,446 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.99 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,217%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
152 % Much better value.
+40%
109 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % Much more popular.
+50%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$140 Cheaper.
+18%
$170
Age
Newest
69 Months More recent.
+20%
86 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
123 fps 175 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+42%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.5 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
109 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
+42%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
90.6 fps Faster complex splatting.
+22%
74.5 fps

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback