Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 539,232 user samples
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
447,556 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% MSI(1462 397D)
Worst Bench: 90% Asus(1043 87F3) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
86.6 % 100 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps 131 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
108 fps 122 fps Better reflection handling.
+13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
92.3 fps 140 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
132 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+29%
102 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
122 fps 142 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
114 fps 151 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+32%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
95.4 fps 147 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
143 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
108 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,774,523 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % 4.38 % Insanely higher market share.
+8,660%
Value
Value For Money
51.3 % 84.6 % Much better value.
+65%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 95 % Much more popular.
+79%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $280 Cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
87 Months 44 Months Much more recent.
+49%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
197 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+43%
138 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.4 fps 96.6 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+23%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
178 fps Much better texture detail.
+45%
123 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
75.8 fps 88.6 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RTX 3060 is Nvidia’s latest 3000 series GPU. Even if it (ever…) comes into stock at $330 USD, it will struggle to match the groundbreaking 3060 Ti in terms of value for money. Nvidia’s new Ampere architecture, which supersedes Turing, offers both improved power efficiency and performance. The 3060 features 3,584 CUDA cores, 112 Tensor cores, it has a boost clock of 1.78 GHz, 12 GB of memory and a power draw of just 170 W. The 3060 offers similar performance to the previous generation’s 2060 Super at an 18% MSRP discount. Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens etc.), AMD’s 6000 series GPU’s will have to see substantial price cuts and a huge marketing effort in order to gain any traction. Meanwhile PC gamers can look forward to an unparalleled gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. At ultra settings, with ray tracing enabled, Cyberpunk 2077 redefines the boundaries of immersive gaming. It makes GTA5 look like Tetris in comparison. The combination of RTX+DLSS delivers stunning graphics that are several tiers higher than both AMD's best discrete GPUs and the upcoming consoles. In terms of real world performance, Nvidia’s 3000 series has more or less put AMD’s Radeon group in checkmate. Nonetheless, AMD’s marketers are capable of delivering elaborate BS albeit whilst struggling to keep a straight face. Their marketing infrastructure outsold Intel in the CPU market despite a 15% performance deficit. Without an appropriate social media marketing strategy, Nvidia will probably lose considerable market share, for all the wrong reasons. [Feb '21 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback