Real World Speed
Performance profile from 124,183 user samples
81,372 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Asus(1043 04C2)
Worst Bench: 47% PowerColor(148C 2379)
Poor: 47% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 621
42,811 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 45% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 69th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
57.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+8%
223 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
133 fps +2% 130 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
170 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
158 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps +3% 119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
280 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+5%
266 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
144 fps +4% 139 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
191 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6%
181 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps +5% 126 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps 139 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+9%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 84 fps +4%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+6%
58 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+9%
49 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps +3% 135 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps +4% 88 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+6%
49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+5%
48 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
110 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+16%
95 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
156 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+43%
109 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+48%
50 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps +0% 83 fps
Market Share
Based on 19,284,305 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.71 % Hugely higher market share.
+470%
0.3 %
Value
Value For Money
110 % Much better value.
+38%
79.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
88 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 Cheaper.
+24%
$170
Age
Newest
28 Months More recent.
+22%
36 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps +3% 191 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps +5% 175 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
166 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
155 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
165 fps +2% 162 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback