Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 240 EFps +3%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
53 EFps 66 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+25%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
68 EFps 77 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+13%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
57 EFps 80 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+40%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
61 EFps 93 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+52%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 654,262 user samples
473,685 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% XFX(1682 C570)
Worst Bench: 37% XFX(1682 C570)
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 139th / 713
180,577 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% MSI(1462 8D95)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 401A)
Poor: 53% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 114th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.7 % 58.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
55.5 fps 76.2 fps Much better lighting effects.
+37%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
58.7 fps 79.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+35%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
58.9 fps 62.3 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
61.7 fps 71.9 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
62.1 fps 81.5 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
62.9 fps 107 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+70%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
61.9 fps 66.4 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
67.8 fps 76.3 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
Market Share
Based on 68,774,107 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.65 % Much higher market share.
+55%
0.42 %
Value
Value For Money
62.4 % Much better value.
+32%
47.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % 86 % More popular.
+28%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+42%
$295
Age
Newest
91 Months 60 Months Much more recent.
+34%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
86.5 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+7%
80.5 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
46.4 fps 62.8 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
77.2 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
72.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
43.6 fps 58.1 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is based on the second generation Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series. The RX 570 is around 10% faster than its predecessor, the RX 470. With 2048 cores, it is a cut down version of the RX 580 which is $30 more expensive and around 20% faster. At $130, the RX 570 offers superb value to gamers on a very tight budget. By dropping detail levels slightly below maximum the RX 570 can deliver 60 EFps in most of today’s popular games. If at all possible, we would suggest spending around $50 more for the 30% faster 8GB RX 590 which can comfortably hold 60+ EFps at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback