Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+12%
240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
64 EFps 66 EFps +3%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+10%
77 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 80 EFps +1%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
92 EFps 93 EFps +1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 302,637 user samples
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
180,577 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% MSI(1462 8D95)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 401A)
Poor: 53% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 114th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.9 % 58.7 % +3%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.8 fps 76.2 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.1 fps 79.5 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.7 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
62.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.4 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+13%
71.9 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
79.8 fps 81.5 fps +2%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.5 fps 107 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+52%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.3 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
66.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
90.3 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+18%
76.3 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,776,491 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % 0.41 % Hugely higher market share.
+720%
Value
Value For Money
168 % Hugely better value.
+257%
47.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % 86 % More popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$80 Much cheaper.
+73%
$295
Age
Newest
72 Months 61 Months More recent.
+15%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
111 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+38%
80.5 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps 62.8 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.9 fps Much better texture detail.
+37%
72.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
52.7 fps 58.1 fps Faster complex splatting.
+10%

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback