Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
252 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
232 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
59 EFps +4% 57 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
79 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+14%
69 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
66 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
84 EFps +4% 81 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 621,514 user samples
360,351 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Worst Bench: 46% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 124th / 713
261,163 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 53% AMD(1002 0B37)
Worst Bench: 35% Asus(1043 04FB)
Poor: 35% Great: 53%
SPEED RANK: 136th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
51.6 % Faster effective speed.
+13%
45.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
65.2 fps Better lighting effects.
+16%
56.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
62.2 fps +4% 59.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.9 fps +4% 61.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
73.4 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+13%
65.2 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
72 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
66.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.4 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
62.6 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.3 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
64.7 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.5 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+8%
75.5 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,679,154 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.11 % Hugely higher market share.
+909%
0.11 %
Value
Value For Money
94.1 % 144 % Much better value.
+53%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % More popular.
+17%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 $75 Much cheaper.
+42%
Age
Newest
90 Months More recent.
+11%
101 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.9 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+7%
92.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+6%
46.5 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
88.4 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+10%
80.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
46.4 fps +5% 44.4 fps

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback