Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
270 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
252 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
64 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
59 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
79 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+13%
70 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
92 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+10%
84 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 482,411 user samples
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
360,351 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Worst Bench: 46% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 124th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.9 % Faster effective speed.
+10%
51.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.8 fps Better lighting effects.
+10%
65.2 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.1 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
62.2 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.7 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
63.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.4 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+11%
73.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
79.8 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+11%
72 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.5 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
66.4 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.3 fps +4% 68.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
90.3 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
81.5 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,770,510 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % 1.09 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,717%
Value
Value For Money
168 % Much better value.
+80%
93.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % 77 %
Price
Price (score)
$80 Much cheaper.
+39%
$131
Age
Newest
72 Months More recent.
+21%
91 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
111 fps Better peak texture detail.
+12%
98.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+9%
49.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.9 fps Better texture detail.
+13%
88.4 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
52.7 fps Faster complex splatting.
+14%
46.4 fps

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback