Real World Speed
Performance profile from 137,835 user samples
116,407 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 66% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 66% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 611
21,428 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 8A91)
Worst Bench: 25% MSI(1462 8A91)
Poor: 25% Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 98th / 611
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+210%
31.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
319 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+170%
118 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+201%
63.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
284 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+222%
88.3 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
194 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+149%
78 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
378 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+176%
137 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+214%
67.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
324 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+221%
101 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+172%
82.7 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+85%
109 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+128%
54 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+76%
46 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
220 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+76%
125 fps
Market Share
Based on 15,661,455 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.64 % Hugely higher market share.
+191%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
80.8 % Much better value.
+40%
57.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
119 % Much more popular.
+49%
80 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $145 Much cheaper.
+70%
Age
Newest
46 Months 22 Months Much more recent.
+52%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+258%
101 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+268%
87.2 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+279%
81.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+253%
79.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $88
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback