Real World Speed
Performance profile from 115,207 user samples
83,710 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% MSI(1462 3354)
Worst Bench: 30% Nvidia(10DE 0939) 2GB
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
SPEED RANK: 83rd / 599
31,497 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 22% Gigabyte(1458 22D2)
Poor: 22% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 99th / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
33.8 % Faster effective speed.
28.2 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps 101 fps +1%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
77.6 fps Faster multi rendering.
63 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
98.1 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
75.3 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
72 fps 77.3 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
113 fps 120 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
82.1 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
65.6 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
105 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
85.4 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.6 fps 80.4 fps +2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps 118 fps +3%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
39 fps 41 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64 fps Better Fortnite fps.
49 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
132 fps Better League of Legends fps.
114 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
59 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps +4% 42 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
67 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
47 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
44 fps
Market Share
Based on 13,883,134 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.3 % Hugely higher market share.
0.28 %
Value For Money
69.4 % Slightly better value.
65.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % 80 % +4%
Price (score)
$125 $104 Cheaper.
26 Months Slightly more recent.
29 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
115 fps Better peak lighting effects.
88.8 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.7 fps 84.6 fps Better peak reflection handling.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
103 fps Much better lighting effects.
72.9 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
65.9 fps 79.3 fps Better reflection handling.

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $363Nvidia GTX 1070 $300Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback