Real World Speed
Performance profile from 225,795 user samples
175,485 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 29% MSI(1462 8C97)
Worst Bench: 26% Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
Poor: 26% Great: 29%
SPEED RANK: 113th / 639
50,310 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 20% Sapphire(174B E348)
Poor: 20% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 136th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
27.6 % Faster effective speed.
21.4 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
104 fps Much better lighting effects.
73.4 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
78.8 fps Faster multi rendering.
63.5 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
99.2 fps Faster NBody calculation.
76.6 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
113 fps Better peak lighting effects.
88.5 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
82.1 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
65.5 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
106 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
85.5 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
113 Fps 117 Fps +3%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
71 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
52 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
39 Fps 39 Fps +1%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
113 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
64 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
59 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
44 Fps +3% 43 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
36 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
32 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
193 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
97 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
74 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
67 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
65 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
47 Fps
Market Share
Based on 31,129,147 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.79 % Hugely higher market share.
0.15 %
Value For Money
50.8 % 56.5 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 80 % Slightly more popular.
Price (score)
$129 $90 Much cheaper.
45 Months Slightly more recent.
48 Months
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.6 fps 84.3 fps Better peak reflection handling.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
114 fps 117 fps +3%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.7 fps 80.3 fps +2%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.4 fps 79 fps Better reflection handling.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
102 fps +2% 100 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
72.1 fps 77.6 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback