COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
About
▲ 679,860 ▼

Release date: Q2 2017.

Game EFps  
+76%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		245 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+5% 		233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		96 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+81% 		53 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		119 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+75% 		68 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		117 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+105% 		57 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		131 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+115% 		61 EFps
Effective Speed 
+90%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 672,499 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
366,438 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Asus(1043 868F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 82% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 82% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 661
306,061 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% Gigabyte(1458 22F7)
Poor: 38% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 661
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		89 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+90% 		46.8 %
Average Score 
+99%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		114 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+101% 		56.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		120 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+102% 		59.3 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		134 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+125% 		59.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		100 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+68% 		59.7 fps
Overclocked Score 
+112%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		124 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+92% 		64.7 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		171 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+166% 		64.3 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		146 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+131% 		63.2 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		107 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+61% 		66.3 fps
Value & Sentiment 
+0%
Market Share
Based on 41,931,125 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		2.35 % Much higher market share.
+47% 		1.6 %
Value
Value For Money 		62.4 % 74 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		85 % More popular.
+27% 		67 %
Price
Price (score) 		$338 $150 Much cheaper.
+56%
Nice To Haves 
+68%
Age
Newest 		27 Months Much more recent.
+44% 		48 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		124 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+40% 		88.7 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		99 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+110% 		47.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		110 fps Much better texture detail.
+41% 		78 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		90.6 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+105% 		44.1 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 89%
Average Bench 46.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is based on the second generation Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series. The RX 570 is around 10% faster than its predecessor, the RX 470. With 2048 cores, it is a cut down version of the RX 580 which is $30 more expensive and around 20% faster. At $130, the RX 570 offers superb value to gamers on a very tight budget. By dropping detail levels slightly below maximum the RX 570 can deliver 60 EFps in most of today’s popular games. If at all possible, we would suggest spending around $50 more for the 30% faster 8GB RX 590 which can comfortably hold 60+ EFps at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
366,438
306,061
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback