PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '21 at 15:54 |
Run Duration | 233 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
|
82.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
93.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 241 132 97 85 90 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
33GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 387 362 339 321 308 MB/s
|
219%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
300GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 103 105 104 MB/s
|
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45
97GB free
Firmware: FB4OC40J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 56 56 56 57 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
464GB free
Firmware: PC3OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52% | 20% | 101 | 159 | 74 | 240 | 24" | 1920 1080 | GSM770F 27GK750F |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,249x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 143x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 118x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 366x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 350x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 282x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $301 |