Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 11:01
Run Duration467 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$157
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 156
2-Core 307
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 948
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 125
Parallax 160
89% 131 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 114
Splatting 82.1
78% 96.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$129
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4698 4690 2271 1631 1406 1165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,754
Write 4,673
Mixed 3,296
SusWrite 2,644
810% 3,592 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 101
357% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,179
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,064
794% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 469%
Great: 595%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
72GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 325 325 325 323 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 498
Mixed 471
SusWrite 340
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60.9
207% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
324GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 519
Write 497
Mixed 471
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.6
205% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
503GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 174 175 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 113
Write 85.6
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 173
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 175 172 172 175 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 93.1
Write 87
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 171
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 126 125 127 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 42
Write 71.5
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 126
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 163 162 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 99.7
Write 121
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 159
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 127 127 125 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 72.4
Write 89.1
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 126
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
528GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 128 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 119
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 126
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB
465GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
Read 39.8
Write 39.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 34.5
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 11.7
1,126% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.2
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 12
1,137% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
478GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 162 162 164 161 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 106
SusWrite 158
176% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
128% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 179
Write 174
Mixed 126
SusWrite 3.2
152% 121 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.8
360% 4.83 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
355% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 109 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 110
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 110
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.8
368% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
416% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 66%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB
897GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 37.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 4.3
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 163 162 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 133
SusWrite 161
211% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 189
Write 167
Mixed 112
SusWrite 0.1
143% 117 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
352% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 105
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 93.9
132% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
276% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 39.4
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 0.2
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 37.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback