Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration554 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$156
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 71
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1164
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 118
Parallax 159
88% 128 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 114
Splatting 81
77% 96.1 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1116 852 844 838 838 827 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,714
Write 2,470
Mixed 1,933
SusWrite 886
447% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 95.9
319% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 803
604% 811 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 298%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
72GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,263
Write 5,248
Mixed 6,235
1,458% 6,582 MB/s
4K Read 408
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 273
1,091% 304 MB/s
DQ Read 1,239
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 880
679% 940 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
236GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 313 314 270 189 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 492
Mixed 468
SusWrite 288
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.5
192% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
503GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 98 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 114
Write 79.8
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 96.3
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 87.5
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 97.1
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 98 98 98 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 111
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 98.5
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 163 162 160 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 49.6
Write 134
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 158
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 98 98 97 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 74.6
Write 106
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 97.3
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
586GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 69 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 115
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 68.2
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB
379GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 132 127 132 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
290% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 367
Mixed 332
SusWrite 128
400% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 19.3
2,931% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 20.5
3,528% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 290%
Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
392GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 129 125 124 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 104
SusWrite 123
158% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
131% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 187
Write 169
Mixed 125
SusWrite 3
150% 121 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.8
374% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 110 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 110
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.8
290% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 3.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 11.4
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 9%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB
901GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 132 127 132 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 128
151% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 120 129 125 124 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 158
Write 165
Mixed 127
SusWrite 126
194% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 187
Write 177
Mixed 110
SusWrite 0
146% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.6
360% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
338% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 38.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 33.7
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.9
264% 3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.2 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 155
Write 120
Mixed 101
SusWrite 1.3
115% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 20,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback