Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 18:07
Run Duration518 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$156
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,056
100% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,458
90% 1,458 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 118
Parallax 160
90% 130 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 114
Splatting 81.9
78% 96.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 889 883 866 870 875 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,688
Write 2495
Mixed 1,867
SusWrite 920
446% 1,993 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 96.1
322% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 1,076
801% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 311%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
71GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,098
Write 7,197
Mixed 8,091
1,879% 8,462 MB/s
4K Read 622
4K Write 324
4K Mixed 402
1,630% 450 MB/s
DQ Read 1687
DQ Write 1067
DQ Mixed 1,187
936% 1,314 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
336GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 263 258 249 245 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 489
Mixed 467
SusWrite 285
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60.2
205% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
503GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 95 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 101
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 95.4
72% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
405GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 96 97 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 97.6
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 99 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 130
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 98.4
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 140 150 157 156 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 102
Write 116
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 150
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 98 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97
Write 100
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 98.2
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$68
616GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 115 114 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 114
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB
415GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 129 129 130 131 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
302% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 365
Mixed 334
SusWrite 128
400% 309 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 19
3,050% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 20.2
3,532% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 302%
Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
223GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 140 141 143 142 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 135
Write 142
Mixed 119
SusWrite 138
183% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
135% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 186
Write 166
Mixed 119
SusWrite 0.4
146% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
355% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
342% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 113 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 113
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
253% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 66%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB
903GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 129 130 131 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 137
Write 99.6
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 129
149% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 140 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 161
Write 165
Mixed 131
SusWrite 142
203% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 193
Write 176
Mixed 103
SusWrite 3.4
145% 119 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.6
353% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 0.6
338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 37.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 33.9
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
151% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 0.8
93% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 38.4
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 20,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback