HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 150
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 410
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 382
Mixed 327
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 18.4
80% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 239
189% 262 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
Micron CT4000X 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: PMAP
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 264
Write 281
Mixed 265
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 10.8
35% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 135
102% 136 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
40GB free
Firmware: 0911
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 142
Mixed 122
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
331% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
72GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 27 29 28 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 114
SusWrite 28.5
73% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion HDD 16TB
184GB free
Firmware: 1801
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 201
Write 199
Mixed 151
137% 183 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.3
630% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
29GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 27 28 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 107
SusWrite 28.8
65% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
372% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
113GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 17 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 32TB
57GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.2
Write 136
Mixed 81.8
128% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
27GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 28 30 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 185
Write 201
Mixed 124
SusWrite 29.7
173% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
39GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 29 30 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46% Average
Read 170
Write 200
Mixed 113
SusWrite 29.9
166% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
200% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
51GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 29 30 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 158
Write 200
Mixed 127
SusWrite 29.9
170% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
204% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 95%
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 32TB
138GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 28 30 29 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
Read 69.7
Write 129
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 29.2
88% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
123% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1321 SP008GLLTU160N02 M378B5173EB0-YK0 1321 SP008GLLTU160N02 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 32 0" 1280 720
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback