Real World Speed
Performance profile from 69,833 user samples
27,344 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 56% Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
Poor: 56% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 543
42,489 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 55% EVGA(3842 4992)
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 543
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
64.7 % -52% 98.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+52%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps -65% 321 fps Much better texture detail.
+65%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps -31% 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+31%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
197 fps -45% 286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+45%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
156 fps -26% 197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
217 fps -76% 382 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+76%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
159 fps -38% 219 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
215 fps -53% 329 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+53%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps -36% 231 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+36%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
161 fps -58% 255 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+58%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.5 fps -30% 122 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+30%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps -36% 84.1 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+36%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.5 fps -39% 94.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+39%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.2 fps -42% 94 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+42%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89.6 fps -45% 130 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+45%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps -30% 154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50.3 fps -65% 83.3 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+65%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.1 fps -66% 108 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+66%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.6 fps -17% 108 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+17%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
187 fps -41% 265 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+41%
Market Share
Based on 4,352,374 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.51 % Slightly higher market share.
+14%
1.32 % -14%
Value
Value For Money
91 % Better value.
+23%
74.1 % -23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
84 % -23% 103 % More popular.
+23%
Price
Price (score)
$220 Much cheaper.
+61%
$560 -61%
Age
Newest
11 Months Much more recent.
+58%
26 Months -58%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps -66% 378 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+66%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps -69% 324 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
206 fps -52% 314 fps Much better lighting effects.
+52%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
177 fps -59% 281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $410Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback