Real World Speed
Performance profile from 176,484 user samples
99,680 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3285)
Poor: 61% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 592
76,804 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.6 % 97 % Much faster effective speed.
+46%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
190 fps 319 fps Much better texture detail.
+68%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 190 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+30%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
193 fps 282 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+46%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
155 fps 195 fps Faster complex splatting.
+26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
215 fps 382 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+78%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
156 fps 214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+37%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps 322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
169 fps 225 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
157 fps 249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+58%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.2 fps 122 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+32%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60.7 fps 83.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+37%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.8 fps 80.7 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+23%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.6 fps 97.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+75%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67.5 fps 98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+46%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87.9 fps 134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+52%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.2 fps 85.2 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+73%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58 fps 90 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+55%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 116 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+22%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
173 fps 243 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+40%
Market Share
Based on 9,195,838 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % Higher market share.
+15%
0.86 %
Value
Value For Money
90.9 % Better value.
+23%
74.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % 105 % More popular.
+15%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Much cheaper.
+58%
$550
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+41%
37 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
224 fps 389 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+74%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps 322 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
204 fps 316 fps Much better lighting effects.
+55%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps 280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+60%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $124
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $116
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $178SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $35HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback