Real World Speed
Performance profile from 139,534 user samples
100,156 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% MSI(1462 3301)
Worst Bench: 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701)
Poor: 80% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 6th / 541
39,378 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 129% Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 73% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 541
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99.5 % -2% 101 % +2%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
313 fps -4% 327 fps +4%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
203 fps +4% 195 fps -4%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
292 fps 0% 292 fps 0%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+14%
200 fps -14%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
359 fps -6% 381 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
223 fps +3% 216 fps -3%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
320 fps -2% 328 fps +2%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
246 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
229 fps -7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
190 fps -6% 200 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+6%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps -1% 123 fps +1%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78.1 fps -6% 83.1 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+6%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.1 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+7%
90.4 fps -7%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86.7 fps -15% 99.4 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+15%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps -17% 140 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+17%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89.4 fps Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+17%
76.7 fps -17%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.7 fps -10% 84.7 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+10%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
257 fps -14% 292 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+14%
Market Share
Based on 3,739,240 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
6.3 % Hugely higher market share.
+367%
1.35 % -367%
Value
Value For Money
99.4 % Better value.
+30%
76.5 % -30%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
151 % Much more popular.
+59%
95 % -59%
Price
Price (score)
$368 Much cheaper.
+34%
$560 -34%
Age
Newest
11 Months Much more recent.
+54%
24 Months -54%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
360 fps -38% 495 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+38%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
320 fps -2% 326 fps +2%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps -3% 329 fps +3%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
292 fps +2% 286 fps -2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $102
Intel Core i5-7600K $240AMD RX 480 $210Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $167
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback