Real World Speed
Performance profile from 843,967 user samples
703,911 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 635
140,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.2 % 78.3 % +0%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
304 fps 314 fps +3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
200 fps +4% 193 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
287 fps 289 fps +1%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
343 fps 360 fps +5%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps +4% 211 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
314 fps 322 fps +3%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
193 Fps 196 Fps +1%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps +0% 121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 81 Fps +1%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
78 Fps 80 Fps +2%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
202 Fps 215 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+7%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps +0% 115 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 Fps 98 Fps +3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 82 Fps +1%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
253 Fps +4% 244 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
145 Fps 153 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+5%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 Fps 91 Fps +3%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+6%
121 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,914,665 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.62 % Hugely higher market share.
+570%
0.54 %
Value
Value For Money
53.5 % Much better value.
+38%
38.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
122 % More popular.
+15%
106 %
Price
Price (score)
$346 Cheaper.
+28%
$480
Age
Newest
43 Months More recent.
+23%
56 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
312 fps 318 fps +2%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
348 fps 370 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+9%
225 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps +0% 284 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
305 fps 324 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+13%
198 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback