Real World Speed
Performance profile from 135,274 user samples
26,145 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 146% MSI(1462 3732)
Worst Bench: 89% EVGA(3842 2172)
Poor: 89% Great: 146%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 611
109,129 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 61% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 611
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
132 % Much faster effective speed.
+38%
95.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
406 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
316 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
358 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+88%
190 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
375 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+34%
279 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
229 fps Faster complex splatting.
+19%
193 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
473 fps Better peak texture detail.
+24%
380 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
391 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+81%
216 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
414 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+27%
326 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
250 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+11%
226 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps 202 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+11%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
110 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+37%
80 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
147 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+21%
122 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
81 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
260 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+18%
220 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps +5% 116 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+28%
97 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+12%
83 fps
Market Share
Based on 15,541,099 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.22 % Much higher market share.
+77%
0.69 %
Value
Value For Money
101 % Better value.
+26%
79.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % 119 % Much more popular.
+45%
Price
Price (score)
$550 $480 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
46 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
443 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+22%
362 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
348 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
322 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
390 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
305 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
314 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
277 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $364Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $49
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $122Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $761SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback