Real World Speed
Performance profile from 289,369 user samples
152,729 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 95% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 95% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 628
136,640 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 69% Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 628
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
108 % Much faster effective speed.
79 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
383 fps Better lighting effects.
319 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
361 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
195 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
370 fps Faster NBody calculation.
292 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
433 fps Better peak lighting effects.
368 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
386 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
211 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
406 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
319 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
235 fps Better CSGO Fps.
196 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
121 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Better PUBG Fps.
81 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better GTAV Fps.
80 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
215 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
115 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Better BF1 Fps.
98 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
106 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
82 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
281 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
244 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
176 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
153 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
91 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
121 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,498,584 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.05 % Hugely higher market share.
0.49 %
Value For Money
56.6 % Much better value.
39 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % 106 % Slightly more popular.
Price (score)
$450 Slightly cheaper.
13 Months Much more recent.
55 Months
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
341 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
317 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps Better peak texture detail.
375 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
224 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
314 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
288 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
408 fps Better texture detail.
330 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
197 fps

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]


The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback