Real World Speed
Performance profile from 130,312 user samples
89,711 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 58% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 595
40,601 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 57% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+47%
66 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
323 fps Better texture detail.
+25%
258 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
127 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
284 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+74%
163 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
195 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+10%
177 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
382 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+33%
288 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+63%
133 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+92%
171 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
187 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
208 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+16%
179 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+81%
46 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
100 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
235 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+34%
176 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+30%
57 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+39%
70 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+62%
52 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+34%
115 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
+105%
49 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+17%
99 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+32%
101 fps
Market Share
Based on 10,955,673 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+158%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 74.7 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
102 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $304 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
40 Months 39 Months +2%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
378 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+77%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
323 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+95%
166 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
314 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
195 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+79%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback