Real World Speed
Performance profile from 92,579 user samples
61,324 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 61% PNY(196E 1511) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 549
31,255 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
66 % -48%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Better texture detail.
+26%
256 fps -26%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
126 fps -52%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+75%
163 fps -75%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+11%
177 fps -11%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+33%
286 fps -33%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
216 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+62%
133 fps -62%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
326 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+90%
172 fps -90%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
229 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
187 fps -22%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
252 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+33%
189 fps -33%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+29%
93.5 fps -29%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.9 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+78%
46.6 fps -78%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.5 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+39%
70 fps -39%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+57%
61 fps -57%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+34%
102 fps -34%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.7 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+57%
53.9 fps -57%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.1 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
+83%
51.9 fps -83%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+17%
102 fps -17%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
277 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+54%
180 fps -54%
Market Share
Based on 6,217,100 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.02 % Hugely higher market share.
+137%
0.43 % -137%
Value
Value For Money
74.7 % -0% 74.7 % +0%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
94 % -12%
Price
Price (score)
$550 -45% $304 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
31 Months -3% 30 Months +3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
382 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+79%
214 fps -79%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
325 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+95%
167 fps -95%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
316 fps Much better lighting effects.
+60%
198 fps -60%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+79%
157 fps -79%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback