Real World Speed
Performance profile from 96,524 user samples
67,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 62% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 566
29,392 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 59% PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 59% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 566
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.7 % Much faster effective speed.
65.8 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
323 fps Better texture detail.
255 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
126 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
163 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
177 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
390 fps Much better peak texture detail.
287 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
134 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
173 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
188 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
250 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
187 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
99 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.1 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
45.5 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
70 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
66.3 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
101 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
119 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85.4 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
51.9 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.4 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
50.6 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
102 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
249 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
187 fps
Market Share
Based on 7,778,928 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.88 % Hugely higher market share.
0.34 %
Value For Money
74.6 % +0% 74.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Slightly more popular.
97 %
Price (score)
$550 $304 Much cheaper.
34 Months 33 Months +3%
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
374 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
213 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
323 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
167 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
315 fps Much better lighting effects.
196 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
280 fps Much better reflection handling.
156 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback