Real World Speed
Performance profile from 114,718 user samples
79,833 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 592
34,885 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Asus(1043 04DD)
Worst Bench: 56% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 56% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+46%
66.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
319 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
258 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
190 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
128 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
282 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+72%
164 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
177 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
375 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+30%
288 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
212 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+58%
134 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+85%
174 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+21%
187 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.2 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+29%
57.4 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+38%
181 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83.7 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+77%
47.2 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
99.5 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+39%
70.2 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.6 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+61%
52.5 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
239 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+30%
184 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
+105%
49.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+46%
65.9 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+34%
115 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+34%
99 fps
Market Share
Based on 9,754,658 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.88 % Hugely higher market share.
+126%
0.39 %
Value
Value For Money
73.8 % 74.8 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
100 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $304 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
38 Months 37 Months +3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
437 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+105%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
319 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+93%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
316 fps Much better lighting effects.
+62%
195 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
278 fps Much better reflection handling.
+77%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback