Real World Speed
Performance profile from 99,856 user samples
66,384 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 590
33,472 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% XFX(1682 9390)
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 58% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
66 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Better texture detail.
+26%
255 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
126 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+75%
163 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+11%
177 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
384 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+35%
284 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+63%
134 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+91%
172 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+21%
187 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+36%
184 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
99.8 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83.2 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+81%
45.9 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80.7 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+41%
57.2 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+39%
70.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+50%
65.9 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+32%
101 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+34%
115 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85.2 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+64%
51.9 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+78%
50.5 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+14%
101 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
243 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+35%
180 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,820,372 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.86 % Hugely higher market share.
+139%
0.36 %
Value
Value For Money
74.4 % 74.7 % +0%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
97 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $304 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
36 Months 35 Months +3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
375 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+75%
214 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
327 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+97%
166 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
313 fps Much better lighting effects.
+58%
198 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
282 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+81%
156 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $136
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback