Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 240,603 user samples
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 713
26,573 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% PowerColor(148C 2357) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 48% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 121st / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
53.5 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps Much better lighting effects.
+41%
69.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
115 fps Much better reflection handling.
+55%
74.3 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
65.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+50%
65.1 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+46%
76 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
132 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+71%
77.2 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+55%
67.9 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+55%
69 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+39%
141 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+43%
85 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+59%
51 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+17%
68 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+11%
193 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+16%
98 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+41%
69 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+49%
55 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+16%
104 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,630,378 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
41.7 % Better value.
+12%
37.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$449 $340 Cheaper.
+24%
Age
Newest
114 Months 113 Months +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
113 fps Better peak texture detail.
+12%
101 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.4 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+104%
47.8 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+8%
92.3 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
87.9 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+90%
46.2 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback