UserBenchmark: AMD R9 380 vs RX Vega-56

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

BUY • $200

AMD

BUY • $170

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 175,080 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

83,027 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 35% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 31% MSI(1462 2015)

Poor: 31% Great: 35%

SPEED RANK: 163^rd / 714

92,053 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 71% Great: 85%

SPEED RANK: 93^rd / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		33.4 %			78 %	Hugely faster effective speed. +134%


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	42 fps	98.3 fps	Hugely better lighting effects. +134%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	45.7 fps	105 fps	Hugely better reflection handling. +130%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	45.2 fps	88.6 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +96%
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	42.1 fps	114 fps	Hugely faster NBody calculation. +171%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	44.6 fps	109 fps	Hugely better peak lighting effects. +144%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	47.7 fps	112 fps	Hugely better peak reflection handling. +135%
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	46.5 fps	94.1 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +102%
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	43.7 fps	128 fps	Hugely faster peak NBody calculation. +193%


CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	133 Fps	158 Fps	Better CSGO Fps. +19%
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	66 Fps	117 Fps	Much Better Fortnite Fps. +77%
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	43 Fps	82 Fps	Hugely Better GTAV Fps. +89%
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	132 Fps	189 Fps	Much Better LoL Fps. +44%
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	75 Fps	123 Fps	Much Better Overwatch Fps. +63%
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	51 Fps	108 Fps	Hugely Better BF1 Fps. +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	42 Fps	87 Fps	Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +105%
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	91 Fps	198 Fps	Hugely Better Minecraft Fps. +117%
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	76 Fps	150 Fps	Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps. +99%
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	49 Fps	79 Fps	Much Better WoW Fps. +60%
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	62 Fps	130 Fps	Hugely Better WoT Fps. +111%

Market Share

Based on 67,532,649 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.01 %		0.05 %	Hugely higher market share. +400%
Value Value For Money	39.6 %		109 %	Hugely better value. +175%
User Rating UBM User Rating	64 %	More popular. +10%	58 %
Price Price (score)	$200		$170	Cheaper. +15%


Age Newest	107 Months	80 Months	More recent. +25%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	60.4 fps	175 fps	Hugely better peak texture detail. +190%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	33.1 fps	77.6 fps	Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +134%
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	54.8 fps	155 fps	Hugely better texture detail. +183%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	32.2 fps	74.5 fps	Hugely faster complex splatting. +131%

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. ^{[Jun '15 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback