Real World Speed
Performance profile from 64,950 user samples
40,435 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% XFX(1682 9460)
Worst Bench: 18% Sapphire(174B E348)
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 127th / 621
24,515 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Sapphire(174B E271)
Worst Bench: 23% Gigabyte(1458 226C)
Poor: 23% Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 107th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
21.4 % 25.6 % Faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps 130 fps Better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
57.3 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
75.9 fps 86.2 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.4 fps 81.4 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
118 fps 144 fps Better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.4 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
59.6 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.2 fps 91.7 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.2 fps 85.2 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps +3% 113 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40 fps 40 fps +1%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps +5% 107 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 67 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
32 fps 36 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
58 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 58 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
Market Share
Based on 20,237,989 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.22 % Hugely higher market share.
0.12 %
Value For Money
48.3 % Much better value.
30.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % Slightly more popular.
74 %
Price (score)
$105 Much cheaper.
37 Months Much more recent.
70 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
88 fps 105 fps Better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84.2 fps +3% 82.1 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
75.5 fps 99 fps Much better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.6 fps +1% 78.5 fps

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback