Real World Speed
Performance profile from 131,796 user samples
103,126 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% XFX(1682 9480)
Worst Bench: 50% PowerColor(148C 2372)
Poor: 50% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 597
28,670 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
Worst Bench: 22% XFX(1682 9460)
Poor: 22% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 98th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+128%
28 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+156%
100 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+120%
63.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+144%
73.4 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+62%
77.1 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+153%
118 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+125%
65.7 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+147%
82.3 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+65%
80.4 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+34%
118 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+39%
40 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+63%
57 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
178 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+55%
115 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+79%
42 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 fps.
+92%
66 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Hugely Better World of Tanks fps.
+122%
46 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+114%
44 fps
Market Share
Based on 12,183,666 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.03 % Hugely higher market share.
+243%
0.3 %
Value
Value For Money
76.4 % Better value.
+18%
64.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % Hugely more popular.
+82%
82 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 $104 Much cheaper.
+63%
Age
Newest
29 Months 27 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+142%
89 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+117%
84.3 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
179 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+144%
73.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+116%
79.1 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
Intel Core i5-8600K $240Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $799Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback