Real World Speed
Performance profile from 192,259 user samples
151,104 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 41% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 625
41,155 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 19% PowerColor(148C 2374)
Poor: 19% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 127th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50.2 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+135%
21.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
259 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+154%
102 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+121%
63.4 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
188 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+146%
76.4 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+62%
77.6 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+153%
118 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+125%
65.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+148%
85.6 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+64%
80.3 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
155 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+33%
116 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+86%
50 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+37%
40 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+43%
112 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+60%
59 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+70%
43 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+67%
32 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+63%
97 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+86%
68 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+119%
46 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,625,967 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.73 % Hugely higher market share.
+232%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
84.9 % Much better value.
+76%
48.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % More popular.
+20%
81 %
Price
Price (score)
$140 $105 Cheaper.
+25%
Age
Newest
41 Months 39 Months +5%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+145%
87.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+116%
84.1 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+147%
74.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+115%
79.4 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback