Real World Speed
Performance profile from 109,538 user samples
15,678 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% Asus(1043 052F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 24% Device(1DA2 E348) 2GB
Poor: 24% Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 84th / 597
93,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
31.1 % 96.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+211%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
120 fps 322 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+168%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.6 fps 192 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+202%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.5 fps 285 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+233%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.6 fps 195 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+151%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
141 fps 379 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+169%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.1 fps 215 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+216%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
96.3 fps 325 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+237%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.1 fps 225 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+171%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps 204 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+84%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+77%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps 230 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+82%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps 154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+71%
Market Share
Based on 12,743,214 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 0.77 % Hugely higher market share.
+208%
Value
Value For Money
59 % 73.8 % Better value.
+25%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % 113 % Much more popular.
+45%
Price
Price (score)
$140 Much cheaper.
+75%
$550
Age
Newest
19 Months Much more recent.
+56%
43 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
101 fps 363 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+259%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
87.4 fps 321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+267%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
83.3 fps 305 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+266%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.9 fps 280 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+250%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $332Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback