Real World Speed
Performance profile from 146,327 user samples
26,096 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 24% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 24% Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 110th / 621
120,231 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 58% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
30.9 % 95.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+210%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
117 fps 318 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+172%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.2 fps 191 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+202%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
87 fps 281 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+223%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.1 fps 195 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+153%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
139 fps 370 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+166%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.1 fps 213 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+213%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
101 fps 324 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+221%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82.8 fps 226 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+173%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
110 fps 199 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+81%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52 fps 123 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+137%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 80 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+74%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps 217 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+83%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72 fps 153 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 fps.
+113%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps 246 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+96%
Market Share
Based on 19,253,747 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.19 % 0.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+221%
Value
Value For Money
48.8 % +3% 47.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
79 % 118 % Much more popular.
+49%
Price
Price (score)
$150 Much cheaper.
+69%
$480
Age
Newest
27 Months Much more recent.
+47%
51 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
101 fps 356 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+252%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
86.6 fps 320 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+270%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
81.3 fps 302 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+271%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.2 fps 280 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+254%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback