Real World Speed
Performance profile from 89,731 user samples
53,466 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 57% MSI(1462 3418)
Poor: 57% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 595
36,265 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 34% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 34% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
44.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
281 fps Much better texture detail.
+61%
174 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
144 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+37%
105 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
198 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+66%
119 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+57%
83.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+64%
196 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+41%
110 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
218 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+72%
127 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+53%
91.1 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
156 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
135 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+42%
41 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+33%
74 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+17%
138 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+44%
51 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+50%
42 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
79 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+47%
54 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+49%
83 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+49%
66 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+57%
64 fps
Market Share
Based on 11,403,672 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.03 % Hugely higher market share.
+480%
0.35 %
Value
Value For Money
97.1 % Much better value.
+60%
60.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
116 % More popular.
+23%
94 %
Price
Price (score)
$221 +3% $228
Age
Newest
17 Months Much more recent.
+58%
40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+58%
145 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+34%
143 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps Much better lighting effects.
+55%
127 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps Much better reflection handling.
+37%
130 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback