Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 421,089 user samples
360,351 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Worst Bench: 46% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 124th / 713
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
51.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+134%
22 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
65.2 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+142%
26.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
62.2 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+121%
28.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.9 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+136%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
73.4 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+134%
31.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
72 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+134%
30.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.4 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+121%
30 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.3 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+137%
28.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.5 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+129%
35.6 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
146 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+33%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+79%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
57 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+14%
50 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
143 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+18%
121 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
170 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+38%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+69%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,682,152 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.1 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,100%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
93.7 % Hugely better value.
+798%
10.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % Much more popular.
+38%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$131 Much cheaper.
+74%
$500
Age
Newest
90 Months 89 Months +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.9 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+133%
42.4 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.4 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+81%
27.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
88.4 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+134%
37.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
46.4 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+92%
24.2 fps

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback