Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 182,798 user samples
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.9 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+158%
22 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.8 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+167%
26.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.1 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+142%
28.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.7 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+150%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.4 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+159%
31.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
79.8 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+159%
30.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.5 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+135%
30 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.3 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+148%
28.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
90.3 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+154%
35.6 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
174 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+58%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+84%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+35%
50 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
169 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+40%
121 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
195 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+58%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+78%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,774,757 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % 0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
168 % Insanely better value.
+1,514%
10.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % Much more popular.
+38%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$80 Hugely cheaper.
+84%
$500
Age
Newest
72 Months More recent.
+20%
90 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
111 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+162%
42.4 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+98%
27.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.9 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+164%
37.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
52.7 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+118%
24.2 fps

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback