Real World Speed
Performance profile from 314,335 user samples
278,999 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Sapphire(1DA2 E353)
Worst Bench: 48% PowerColor(148C 2378)
Poor: 48% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 53rd / 621
35,336 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 75% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 75% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
54.4 % 93.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+72%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
283 fps 548 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+94%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 188 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps 374 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+80%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps 295 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+125%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
318 fps 630 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+98%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps 197 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+28%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
228 fps 429 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+88%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps 310 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+123%
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
147 fps 223 fps Much Better CSGO fps.
+51%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+31%
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 104 fps Much Better PUBG fps.
+54%
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 87 fps Much Better GTAV fps.
+54%
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps 188 fps Much Better LoL fps.
+32%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps 128 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+29%
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72 fps 97 fps Much Better BF1 fps.
+35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 89 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+44%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
173 fps 214 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+24%
WoW
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 85 fps Better WoW fps.
+26%
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 126 fps Much Better WoT fps.
+33%
Market Share
Based on 20,862,682 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.95 % Hugely higher market share.
+676%
0.38 %
Value
Value For Money
75.8 % Much better value.
+71%
44.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
117 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
106 %
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+66%
$500
Age
Newest
30 Months 26 Months Slightly more recent.
+13%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
226 fps 373 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+65%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps 245 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+29%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
201 fps 322 fps Much better lighting effects.
+60%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
179 fps 234 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $338Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback