Real World Speed
Performance profile from 456,113 user samples
319,473 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% XFX(1682 C580)
Worst Bench: 52% XFX(1682 C580)
Poor: 52% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 54th / 628
136,640 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 69% Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 628
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
57.1 % 79 % Much faster effective speed.
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
198 fps 319 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 195 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+34%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps 292 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps 368 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+61%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps 211 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+36%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
230 fps 319 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+39%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
146 fps 196 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+34%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 121 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+30%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 81 fps Better PUBG Fps.
+21%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 80 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+40%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
143 fps 215 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+50%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 fps 115 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+16%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
71 fps 98 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
61 fps 82 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+35%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
170 fps 244 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+44%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 fps 153 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+26%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 91 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+35%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 121 fps Better WoT Fps.
+27%
Market Share
Based on 22,498,835 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.52 % Hugely higher market share.
+618%
0.49 %
Value
Value For Money
79.6 % Hugely better value.
+104%
39 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
134 % More popular.
+26%
106 %
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+65%
$480
Age
Newest
31 Months Much more recent.
+44%
55 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps 317 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+65%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps 375 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps 224 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+61%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
179 fps 288 fps Much better reflection handling.
+61%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
286 fps 330 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 197 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+49%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback