Real World Speed
Performance profile from 234,227 user samples
20,197 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 178% PowerColor(148C 2406) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 165% XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 165% Great: 178%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 715
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 715
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
171 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+116%
79 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
202 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+105%
98.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+106%
115 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
377 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+289%
97 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
164 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+68%
97.7 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+94%
111 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+91%
132 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
397 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+278%
105 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+62%
107 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,600,240 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.09 % 0.36 % Hugely higher market share.
+300%
Value
Value For Money
62.3 % Hugely better value.
+86%
33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 66 % More popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$650 $560 Cheaper.
+14%
Age
Newest
42 Months Much more recent.
+61%
108 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
447 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+296%
113 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
331 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+240%
97.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
421 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+321%
100 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
310 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+253%
87.9 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. AMD have upgraded the single fan cooler to a more efficient triple fan solution, perhaps indicating a shift in focus from benchmark busting headlines to user experience. Following the widespread issues that users faced with the 5000 and Vega series, we are cautiously optimistic that AMD have taken steps to ensure driver and hardware stability, this will need to be proven over time. The release of the 6000 series explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar when they released their 3070 just a few weeks ago. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6800 cards. At higher resolutions and detail settings, performance can bottleneck without sufficient GPU memory. AMD's marketers often cherry pick obscure games with high res/settings, the details of which are rarely disclosed, then compare the results with cards that have less memory. In that scenario, the cards with less memory look weaker than they would at 1080p. The 1080p results are sometimes omitted, or worse, partially omitted and frame drops are conveniently ignored. Most users will see little benefit in gaming at high resolutions. Without drastic price cuts (MSRP $650 USD) and miraculous marketing via countless promo videos and sponsored reviews, the 6800 XT will struggle to compete, partly because it lacks RTX+DLSS which is required for the best gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. Users should be wary of AMD’s army of social media accounts, they aim to dupe shoppers any way they can. [Nov '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback