COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
AMD
VS
Effective Speed 
0%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 184,106 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 713
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		78 % 78 %
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		78 % 78 %
Average Score 
0%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		98.3 fps 98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		105 fps 105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		88.6 fps 88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		114 fps 114 fps
Overclocked Score 
0%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		109 fps 109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		112 fps 112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		94.1 fps 94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		128 fps 128 fps
Game FPS 
0%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		158 Fps 158 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		117 Fps 117 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		89 Fps 89 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		82 Fps 82 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		189 Fps 189 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		123 Fps 123 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		108 Fps 108 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		87 Fps 87 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		198 Fps 198 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		150 Fps 150 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		79 Fps 79 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		130 Fps 130 Fps
Value & Sentiment 
0%
Market Share
Based on 68,667,446 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % 0.06 %
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.06 % 0.06 %
Value
Value For Money 		109 % 109 %
Value
Value For Money 		109 % 109 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 58 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 58 %
Price
Price (score) 		$170 $170
Price
Price (score) 		$170 $170
Nice To Haves 
0%
Age
Newest 		86 Months 86 Months
Age
Newest 		86 Months 86 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		175 fps 175 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		77.6 fps 77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		155 fps 155 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		74.5 fps 74.5 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 78%
Average Bench 78%

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
92,053
92,053
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback