Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,103,602 user samples
1,033,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Asus(1043 85AE)
Worst Bench: 52% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Poor: 52% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 77th / 661
70,549 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 77% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 661
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
57 % 93.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+64%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
70.7 fps 111 fps Much better lighting effects.
+57%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
78.5 fps 108 fps Much better reflection handling.
+38%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
66.7 fps 92.1 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
71.1 fps 127 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+79%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
77.4 fps 127 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
110 fps 116 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+5%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
74.6 fps 96.8 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+30%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
76.3 fps 142 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+86%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 Fps 223 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+39%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps 121 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+20%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 Fps 104 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+52%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps 88 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+42%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
178 Fps 194 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+9%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps 127 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+25%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 Fps 97 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
56 Fps 88 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+57%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+6%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
77 Fps 89 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+16%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 Fps 125 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+19%
Market Share
Based on 42,560,005 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.62 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,915%
0.13 %
Value
Value For Money
46.6 % 55.3 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % More popular.
+19%
68 %
Price
Price (score)
$290 Cheaper.
+27%
$400
Age
Newest
58 Months 44 Months More recent.
+24%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.8 fps 202 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+170%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
72.2 fps 80.6 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
68 fps 178 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+162%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
64.4 fps 76.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card provided prices settle appropriately. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $216Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback