Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 501,020 user samples
440,282 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% EVGA(3842 2966)
Worst Bench: 30% HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
SPEED RANK: 166th / 713
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
32.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+50%
22 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
42.1 fps Much better lighting effects.
+57%
26.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
45.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+62%
28.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
36.3 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+34%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
40.2 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
31.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
46.4 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
30.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
56.8 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+89%
30 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
38.2 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+33%
28.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
43.3 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+22%
35.6 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
138 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+26%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+40%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 Fps 50 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+19%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
123 Fps +1% 121 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+47%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+14%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,744,764 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,225%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
39.3 % Hugely better value.
+277%
10.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
62 % More popular.
+11%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$198 Much cheaper.
+60%
$500
Age
Newest
118 Months 90 Months More recent.
+24%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
43.7 fps +3% 42.4 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
37.9 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+39%
27.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
39.8 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+5%
37.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
35.1 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
24.2 fps

The new GTX 960 is the third graphics card to feature Nvidia's Maxwell architecture. When the first two Maxwell cards were released back in September 2014 they completely re-shaped the GPU price/performance spectrum not only from Nvidia, but also AMD who were forced to slash prices by around 30%. Unfortunately the new GTX 960 isn't the game changer its predecessors were, and it's actually the weakest of the three Maxwell cards. Comparing the GTX 960 and 970 shows that the 970 is around 70% faster and a comparison of the GTX 960 and 980 shows that GTX 980 is almost exactly twice as fast as the 960. Of the three cards the GTX 970 offers the best bang for your buck, in-fact the GTX 970 is still one of best value cards available. That said, for gaming at 1080p or lower, the GTX 960 will allow decent frame rates at maximum settings for most games. [Jan '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback