Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 172,247 user samples
111,509 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 28% EVGA(3842 2957)
Worst Bench: 22% Zotac(19DA 1376)
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
SPEED RANK: 189th / 713
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
25.6 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
22 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
31.6 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
26.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
37.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+33%
28.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
34.2 fps Faster multi rendering.
+26%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
31.4 fps 31.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
35.9 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
30.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
45.8 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+53%
30 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
36.3 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+26%
28.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
34.6 fps 35.6 fps +3%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+11%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 Fps 52 Fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
+6%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
38 Fps 50 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+29%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 Fps 121 Fps +2%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+8%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
84 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+17%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,745,554 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % Much higher market share.
+50%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
60.6 % Hugely better value.
+480%
10.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % Slightly more popular.
+5%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$100 Much cheaper.
+80%
$500
Age
Newest
111 Months 90 Months More recent.
+19%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
32.7 fps 42.4 fps Better peak texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
30.9 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+13%
27.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
29.6 fps 37.8 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
28.1 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
24.2 fps

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback