Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 956,298 user samples
834,238 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 54% MSI(1462 3160)
Worst Bench: 43% MSI(1462 3160)
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
SPEED RANK: 132nd / 713
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
49.1 % 56.9 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
60.4 fps 71.8 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.3 fps +3% 68.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
66.6 fps 67.7 fps +2%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
61.2 fps 81.4 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+33%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
67.8 fps 79.8 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
94.9 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+35%
70.5 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
69.7 fps 71.3 fps +2%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
66.5 fps 90.3 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+36%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps 174 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+12%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps 96 Fps +2%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 Fps 67 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+7%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 Fps 67 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+27%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps 169 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+8%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 107 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+10%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps 77 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 Fps 84 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+76%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
189 Fps 195 Fps +3%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 128 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+5%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 100 Fps +3%
Market Share
Based on 68,770,510 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.77 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,183%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
58.2 % 168 % Hugely better value.
+190%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 77 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$200 $80 Much cheaper.
+60%
Age
Newest
122 Months 72 Months Much more recent.
+41%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
67.7 fps 111 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+64%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
58.3 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
54 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
61 fps 99.9 fps Much better texture detail.
+64%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
53.6 fps +2% 52.7 fps

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback