Real World Speed
Performance profile from 134,016 user samples
114,686 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
19,330 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 54% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 54% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.7 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
61.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
327 fps +1% 325 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
194 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
159 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
290 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
236 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35%
146 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
374 fps +3% 362 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
210 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+27%
165 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
320 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+24%
258 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
222 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+47%
151 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+27%
154 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+32%
93 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+17%
69 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+15%
70 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+33%
164 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
108 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+18%
70 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
242 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+18%
205 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+26%
95 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,082,054 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % 0.59 % Slightly higher market share.
+11%
Value
Value For Money
38.9 % 63.1 % Much better value.
+62%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % 111 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $230 Much cheaper.
+52%
Age
Newest
52 Months 10 Months Hugely more recent.
+81%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+41%
257 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
316 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+48%
213 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
317 fps Much better lighting effects.
+40%
226 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
287 fps Much better reflection handling.
+41%
204 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $211
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $630SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback