Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 289,948 user samples
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 713
75,918 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705)
Worst Bench: 78% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79 % 85 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps 107 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
115 fps 122 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97 fps 103 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.7 fps 120 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps 115 fps +4%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
132 fps 136 fps +3%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 114 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps 129 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
184 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 152 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+25%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 89 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+12%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 216 Fps +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 112 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+37%
Market Share
Based on 68,772,457 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.18 % Hugely higher market share.
+125%
0.08 %
Value
Value For Money
41.7 % 73.2 % Much better value.
+76%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % 69 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$449 $275 Much cheaper.
+39%
Age
Newest
114 Months 64 Months Much more recent.
+44%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
113 fps 180 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+59%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
91 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps 164 fps Much better texture detail.
+64%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
87.9 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+10%
80.2 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback