Real World Speed
Performance profile from 156,527 user samples
140,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 635
16,471 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% ASRock(1849 5102) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Gigabyte(1458 2314)
Poor: 83% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.3 % 88.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+13%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
314 fps 333 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps 209 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
289 fps 332 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+15%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
360 fps 390 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
211 fps 229 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps 367 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
184 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 152 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+25%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 89 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+12%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 216 Fps +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 112 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+37%
Market Share
Based on 23,838,878 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % 0.61 % Higher market share.
+15%
Value
Value For Money
38.6 % 67.9 % Much better value.
+76%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 141 % Much more popular.
+33%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $310 Much cheaper.
+35%
Age
Newest
56 Months 6 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+10%
288 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
370 fps 742 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+101%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps 351 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+56%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10%
258 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
324 fps 663 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+105%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps 317 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 (RDNA) GPU which is built on a 7nm process. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT) and 8 GB of GDDR6 capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback