Real World Speed
Performance profile from 396,272 user samples
160,682 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 70% Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 651
235,590 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% XFX(1682 5701)
Worst Bench: 97% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 97% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
82.7 % 107 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
104 fps 134 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
92.6 fps 116 fps Faster multi rendering.
+25%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
96.7 fps 137 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+42%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
119 fps 147 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+24%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
102 fps 121 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps 148 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+38%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps 242 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+23%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 167 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+38%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 94 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+15%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 117 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+48%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 225 Fps +5%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 135 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 115 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+40%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+13%
215 Fps
Market Share
Based on 35,860,133 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % 2.48 % Hugely higher market share.
+451%
Value
Value For Money
35 % 63.3 % Hugely better value.
+81%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % 131 % More popular.
+26%
Price
Price (score)
$560 $400 Cheaper.
+29%
Age
Newest
66 Months 16 Months Much more recent.
+76%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
122 fps 149 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+22%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
117 fps 258 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+121%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.1 fps 99.3 fps +2%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
110 fps 143 fps Much better reflection handling.
+30%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps 212 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+110%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
84.7 fps 95.7 fps Faster complex splatting.
+13%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback