Real World Speed
Performance profile from 188,522 user samples
127,332 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% MSI(1462 3233)
Poor: 68% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 634
61,190 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% XFX(1682 5701) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 99% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.2 % 106 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps 389 fps Better lighting effects.
+22%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps 238 fps Faster multi rendering.
+23%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
289 fps 399 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
368 fps 440 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
211 fps 246 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps 425 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps 242 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+23%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 167 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+38%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 94 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+15%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 117 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+48%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 225 Fps +5%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 135 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 115 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+40%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+13%
215 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,705,040 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % 2.11 % Hugely higher market share.
+291%
Value
Value For Money
38.6 % 61.1 % Much better value.
+58%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 123 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $410 Slightly cheaper.
+15%
Age
Newest
56 Months 6 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
316 fps +2% 309 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
374 fps 861 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+130%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
222 fps 378 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+70%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps 291 fps +2%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps 780 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+139%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps 363 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+84%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback