Real World Speed
Performance profile from 163,852 user samples
132,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 63% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
31,408 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 102% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 102% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
77.8 % 114 % Much faster effective speed.
+46%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps 776 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+138%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps 236 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps 395 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+37%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps 356 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+80%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps 866 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+128%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps 245 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps 423 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps 373 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+67%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps 260 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+32%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps 163 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+32%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
218 fps 264 fps Better LoL Fps.
+22%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,579 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.55 % 1.73 % Hugely higher market share.
+215%
Value
Value For Money
38.4 % 66.8 % Much better value.
+74%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 124 % More popular.
+17%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $404 Cheaper.
+16%
Age
Newest
54 Months 4 Months Hugely more recent.
+93%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
357 fps 441 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+24%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps +3% 308 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
311 fps 401 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps 296 fps +4%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback