Real World Speed
Performance profile from 261,969 user samples
121,913 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% MSI(1462 3755)
Worst Bench: 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 76% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 635
140,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
85.2 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
78.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
334 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
314 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
281 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+46%
193 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
293 fps +1% 289 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
371 fps +3% 360 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
299 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+42%
211 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
317 fps 322 fps +2%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 Fps +0% 196 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+16%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+21%
81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
84 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+5%
80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
204 Fps 215 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+6%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+7%
115 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 Fps 98 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+13%
82 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
280 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+15%
244 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
142 Fps 153 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+8%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps +1% 91 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
159 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+32%
121 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,913,879 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.73 % Hugely higher market share.
+220%
0.54 %
Value
Value For Money
59.4 % Much better value.
+54%
38.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
152 % Much more popular.
+43%
106 %
Price
Price (score)
$340 Cheaper.
+29%
$480
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+79%
56 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps 318 fps +3%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
386 fps +4% 370 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
201 fps 225 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps +0% 284 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
343 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
324 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
185 fps 198 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+7%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play on or below 1080p. For gamers that play on 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback