Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 353,184 user samples
261,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 139% EVGA(3842 3183)
Worst Bench: 116% Asus(1043 8736) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 713
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
131 % Much faster effective speed.
+51%
86.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
176 fps Much better lighting effects.
+59%
111 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps Much better reflection handling.
+68%
108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
197 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+113%
92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
156 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+18%
132 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+57%
122 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
242 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+112%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
210 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+120%
95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
166 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
143 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
251 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+13%
223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
185 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+52%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
142 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+36%
104 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+38%
88 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,775,539 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.7 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,300%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
66.4 % Better value.
+29%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
74 % Much more popular.
+40%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$466 $400 Cheaper.
+14%
Age
Newest
63 Months More recent.
+28%
87 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
202 fps +3% 197 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
137 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+75%
78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
180 fps +1% 178 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+72%
75.8 fps

The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA’s latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD. In terms of specification changes between the two, the 2080 has 2944 CUDA cores, compared to 3072 in the 2080 Super, core and boost clocks have increased from 1515 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1650 MHz and 1815 MHz, respectively, memory bandwidth has increased from 14 Gbps to 15.5 Gbps and the TDP has increased from 215 W to 250 W. This translates to a roughly 10% effective speed advantage over the original 2080. The RTX 2080S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Competition in this price bracket is in the form of the AMD’s Radeon VII, over which, early benchmarks suggest, the 2080 Super commands a 15% effective speed advantage. The RTX 2080 Super however, is not a value champion and those seeking more bang for their buck may do well to consider Nvidia’s own $500 USD RTX 2070 Super (which has 17% lower effective speed). [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback