Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 755,279 user samples
663,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 105% Dell(1028 C723) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 713
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
86.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
150 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
111 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Much better reflection handling.
+43%
108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+97%
92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 132 fps +2%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
122 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+82%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+105%
95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps 143 fps +4%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
232 Fps +4% 223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
167 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+38%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+13%
104 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+27%
88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
234 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+21%
194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 Fps 127 Fps +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+39%
88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
254 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+26%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 Fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+46%
89 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,680,191 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,620%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
99.4 % Hugely better value.
+94%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % Much more popular.
+62%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$275 Much cheaper.
+31%
$400
Age
Newest
63 Months More recent.
+27%
86 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps 197 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+56%
78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
148 fps 178 fps Better texture detail.
+20%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
115 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+52%
75.8 fps

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback