COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
Game EFps  
+21%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		271 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18% 		229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		125 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+14% 		110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		182 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+32% 		138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		167 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+31% 		127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		174 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+11% 		157 EFps
Effective Speed 
+31%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 697,375 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
442,467 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 136% EVGA(3842 3667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 4097) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 116% Great: 136%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 713
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		128 % Much faster effective speed.
+31% 		98.3 %
Average Score 
+30%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		179 fps Much better lighting effects.
+44% 		124 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		176 fps Better reflection handling.
+27% 		139 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		183 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+55% 		118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		134 fps 140 fps +4%
Overclocked Score 
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		195 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+47% 		133 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		222 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+52% 		146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		195 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+60% 		122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		142 fps 151 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6%
Value & Sentiment 
+194%
Market Share
Based on 68,447,299 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		2.66 % Hugely higher market share.
+731% 		0.32 %
Value
Value For Money 		89.5 % +2% 87.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		97 % Much more popular.
+64% 		59 %
Price
Price (score) 		$340 $266 Cheaper.
+22%
Nice To Haves 
+4%
Age
Newest 		46 Months More recent.
+26% 		62 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		180 fps 229 fps Better peak texture detail.
+27%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		123 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25% 		98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		162 fps 205 fps Better texture detail.
+27%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		115 fps Faster complex splatting.
+22% 		94.3 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 128%
Average Bench 98.3%

The RTX 3060 Ti is Nvidia’s latest 3000 series GPU. Assuming it (ever…) comes into stock at $400 USD, it will take the crown as the best value for money graphics card. Nvidia’s new Ampere architecture, which supersedes Turing, offers both improved power efficiency and performance. The 3060 Ti features 4,864 CUDA cores, 152 Tensor cores, it has a boost clock of 1.665 GHz, 8 GB of memory and a power draw of just 200 W. Nvidia’s entire 3000 series lineup offers once in a decade price/performance improvements. The 3060 Ti beats the previous generation’s 2060 Super by 30% in terms of effective speed at the same MSRP. Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens etc.), AMD’s 6000 series GPU’s will have to see substantial price cuts and a huge marketing effort in order to gain any traction. Meanwhile, Christmas has come early for PC gamers who can look forward to an unparalleled gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. At ultra settings, with ray tracing enabled, Cyberpunk 2077 redefines the boundaries of immersive gaming. It makes GTA5 look like Tetris in comparison. The combination of RTX+DLSS delivers stunning graphics that are several tiers higher than both AMD's best discrete GPUs and the upcoming consoles. In terms of real world performance, Nvidia’s 3000 series has more or less put AMD’s Radeon group in checkmate. Nonetheless, AMD’s marketers are capable of delivering elaborate BS albeit whilst struggling to keep a straight face. Their marketing infrastructure outsold Intel in the CPU market despite a 15% performance deficit. Without an appropriate social media marketing strategy, Nvidia may lose considerable market share, for all the wrong reasons. [Dec '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
442,467
254,908
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback