Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GTX 1650

Average Bench: 42.8% (142nd of 713)

Based on 259,091 user benchmarks.  Devices: 10DE 1F82, 10DE 2188 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

Poor: 39%Average: 42.8% Great: 46%

Popular builds with this GPU

Below average average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1650 averaged 57.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 54.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 44.7fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1650 is just 6.99%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1650 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 58.1fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 49.3fps

Average Bench

(Based on 259,091 samples)
Rank 14242.8%
Min Avg Max
49.6 Lighting 54.7 58.9
52.2 Reflection 58.1 77.6
42.9 Parallax 49.3 54.2
44.5% 54 fps
Min Avg Max
39.7 MRender 51.6 64.8
46.7 Gravity 50 53.2
41.5 Splatting 44.7 48.3
39.5% 48.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 8D97)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
46.2% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 53.1
48% 64.8 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 46.8
43% 53.9 fps
MSI(1462 8D97)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.94
46% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 54.2
47% 57.1 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 47.9
44% 54.9 fps
Asus(1043 878D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
44.4% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 51.6
46% 54.7 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 45.3
42% 52.8 fps
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.94
41.5% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 47.5
44% 52.1 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 45
37% 45.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
40.8% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 48.6
41% 51.4 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 43.9
41% 51 fps
259,091 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,720,723 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 259,091 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $150 @ launch in Apr '19)
Hide stale prices
MSI(1462 8D92) 13% 43% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Ventus XS OC
G1650VXS4C
AmazonUS $25016 mins
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) 8% 42% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA 3595) 7% 42% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) 4% 42% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB OC
GV-N1650OC-4GD
AmazonUS $18927 days
EbayUS $62316 days
Sapphire(174B A548) 4% 41% ± 2%
HP(103C 8558) 4% 42% ± 2%
MSI(1462 8D97) 4% 44% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Ventus XS OCV3
GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OCV3
AmazonUS $15216 mins
Gigabyte(1458 4027) 4% 43% ± 2%
PNY(196E 1361) 3% 43% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 4028) 3% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B9) 3% 41% ± 2%
Asus GTX 1650 4GB Phoenix
PH-GTX1650-O4G
AmazonUS $28416 mins
Asus(1043 8773) 2% 44% ± 2%
MSI(1462 3800) 2% 45% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Gaming X
GTX 1650 Gaming X 4G
BHPhotoUS $1554 years
EbayUS $3207 months
Zotac(19DA 1546) 2% 42% ± 2%
Zotac GTX 1650 4GB OC Compact
ZT-T16500F-10L
EbayUS $35026 mins
AmazonUS $4001 month
Gigabyte(1458 400E) 2% 41% ± 3%
EVGA(3842 1057) 2% 44% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1320) 2% 42% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 4026) 2% 42% ± 2%
Nvidia(10DE 1363) 2% 42% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) 2% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB Mini ITX OC
GV-N1650IXOC-4GD
AmazonUS $2993 years
Asus(1043 86B6) 2% 42% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B7) 2% 42% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 2188) 1% 43% ± 3%
Asus(1043 8772) 1% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 87A7) 1% 44% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3870) 1% 46% ± 2%
Asus(1043 8771) 1% 46% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) 1% 43% ± 1%
Device(7377 2000) 1% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 871C) 1% 42% ± 1%
PNY(196E 1327) 1% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86BA) 1% 42% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 9548) 1% 42% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA C548) 1% 41% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86D5) 0% 42% ± 1%
PNY(196E 1366) 0% 43% ± 1%
PNY(196E 1365) 0% 45% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B A595) 0% 43% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2583) 0% 46% ± 0%
Asus(1043 878D) 0% 43% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA 1596) 0% 42% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) 0% 45% ± 2%
Asus(1043 871A) 0% 44% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2595) 0% 43% ± 1%
Asus(1043 8790) 0% 39% ± 3%
EVGA(3842 1257) 0% 46% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 145E) 0% 46% ± 1%
Asus(1043 8774) 0% 44% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 4025) 0% 46% ± 0%
Dell(1028 1265) 0% 43% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1153) 0% 0% ± 0%
EVGA GTX 1650 4GB XC Gaming
04G-P4-1153-KR
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GTX 1650 Builds (Compare 3,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel  $94Bench 85%, 153,026 samples2,400x
Core i5-10400Intel  $123Bench 84%, 71,804 samples550x
Core i7-10700Intel  $359Bench 93%, 71,010 samples497x
GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia  $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples1,446x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples492x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples381x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 201%, 4,037 samples180x
RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples209x
ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 12GBKingstonBench 56%, 475 samples203x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples178x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $246

Popular GTX 1650 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

GPUPro
Avatar level
1,641

Official site www.nvidia.com/...

Added 5 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,034

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

3 days ago.

Comment 

It's a brand new card that can't compete with nearly 4 year old AMD cards in power and price. Very disappointed.—Apr '19

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,898

Good

7 days ago.

Very nice budget low profile gaming 1080p 100+ fps beast

HKG-User
Avatar level
5,574

Good

6 months ago.

i used it for around 2 years i think and it served me good

ESP-User
Avatar level
3,813

Excellent

2 months ago.

great option to play a lot of games in high graphics at 45 fps, if you play at medium you can get more than 60, and i play fortnite at 165 low, it can get like 300 frames but i dont have a 300hz monitor

UKR-User
Avatar level
3,621

Excellent

14 months ago.

its much better and affordable with a good performance :)

JPN-User
Avatar level
3,464

Poor

19 days ago.

I am using it and I hardly bottlenecks with my Ryzen 3 4100, good performance, I can run Roblox full graphics at 138 FPS

MYS-User
Avatar level
3,341

Good

1 month ago.

its very good for its price but omg the fan sounds like a jet engine

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,940

Good

1 month ago.

its okay but in my case where i want to play games at 85 fps + its not enough but its very good with csgo, fortnite, the forest and gta v

CHE-User
Avatar level
2,656

Poor

2 months ago.

i dont care what the original comment was

Comment 

Bad price, bad performance, how did NVIDIA make a worse GPU compared to a 2 year old AMD card with pretty much the same price?—Apr '19

NZL-User
Avatar level
2,182

Good

1 month ago.

Works well, but is limited by my cooling atm

LKA-User
Avatar level
1,964

Good

5 months ago.

It'not good why you doing that

BGD-User
Avatar level
1,896

Poor

2 months ago.

Bro go use A G100 becuase this GPU is Bari Hari's fav Fangirling instrument

GEO-User
Avatar level
1,884

Excellent

11 months ago.

It's cheap, it can even handle Cyberpunk 2077, it's quiet and not overheating. Is there even any better 150$ GPU?

LVA-User
Avatar level
1,762

Poor

3 months ago.

One of the worst Gpus to buy in 2022 surpasses by the RTX 580

BIH-User
Avatar level
1,742

Excellent

18 days ago.

very good gpu but get a gtx 1650s if you have the money its worth it

GPUPro
Avatar level
1,641

Good

5 years ago.

TUN-User
Avatar level
1,510

Poor

3 months ago.

it's great for esport game and some AAA games

URY-User
Avatar level
1,230

Excellent

5 months ago.

My first graphic card, my first love

QAT-User
Avatar level
950

Poor

7 months ago.

It's my first ever gaming graphics card. I can run games with either medium or high settings without any FPS lag. The previous graphics card I had was a Nvidia 930MX which was alright for gaming but not the best for high quality games. So far I'm in love with this graphics card and someday I'll own a better one in the future. Probably better than the RTX.

OMN-User
Avatar level
750

Excellent

4 days ago.

gta v AND FORZA HORIZON 5 RUNNING WELL

GHA-User
Avatar level
556

Good

4 months ago.

Used it for almost a year now and I can say it does still pack a punch when it comes to some of this years games. Wonderful really.

ColdSpy
Avatar level
330

Excellent

5 years ago.

The most powerful GPU you can buy to upgrade your OEM computer without having to replace either PSU and/or entirety of your computer.

RavenBailiff
Avatar level
314

Terrible

5 years ago.

Overpriced.

0306
Avatar level
216

Average

4 years ago.

good performance, but buy a rx 570 because its cheaper

ExecutableFiles
Avatar level
122

Poor

4 years ago.

It tried to fix their 1050 but it just didn't work. The super variant is just so much better.

Test19
Avatar level
104

Poor

4 years ago.

For the same price range as of 1/18/20, one can get a RX570 and get a 450W Corsair CX PSU for the same price range and get better gaming performance for the OEM desktop.

HM100_techno
Avatar level
70

Good

4 years ago.

Not best performance as its Super variant but fine for moderate gaming (Or heavy non-demanding gaming)

Mathinios
Avatar level
28

Excellent

4 years ago.

Cheap and efficient

ProshotJake
Avatar level
28

Good

4 years ago.

Cheap and uses no external power. I paired it with an older Ivy Bridge CPU and made a nice little budget 1080p monster. Though, if raw power per dollar is more important than efficiency I'd look elsewhere.

EthanOZT
Avatar level
26

Good

10 months ago.

Very good gpu, but just about not powerful enough. for games on 1080p ultra

Bitbat
Avatar level
22

Poor

5 years ago.

Compared to the RX 570, this GPU is very weak and expensive for the price. AMD easily crushes Nvidia via the RX 570, which has a better value.

userbanchmark
Avatar level
18

Terrible

5 years ago.

terrible overpriced & underperforming card

sanyo
Avatar level
16

Good

17 months ago.

Good for 1080p medium 60 fps.

valen7
Avatar level
10

Good

11 months ago.

It can run all games well at minimum settings @1080p, very affordable budget card.

noedecle
Avatar level
8

Terrible

5 years ago.

Way too overpriced at launch. Better buy something else.

AOG_PC
Avatar level
8

Average

3 years ago.

The 1650 super is worse than the 1660 super and cheaper in the same time. The 1650 is cheaper than the 1660 and is MUCH worse in the same time. It is a bit overpriced. It should either cost around 160$ or it will remain bad. If you want to have the best performance for as little as possible, invest in a 1650 super.

ReidMiller35
Avatar level
8

Terrible

3 years ago.

good

frightening
Avatar level
4

Poor

4 years ago.

not enough power

StarryXeon
Avatar level
2

Average

5 years ago.

It's a decent card for lower end systems and functions well when overclocked; however, NVIDIA gave this card too high of a price for its specs, and when compared to the RX 570, it can really be a disappointment. The fact that this still uses the old Volta NVENC encoder really shows that NVIDIA didn't work hard enough on this card since every other Turing GPU has the Turing encoder.

hepstar82
Avatar level
2

Excellent

4 years ago.

Best 75Watt card with no additional power connectors needed what you can buy. great for old systems with low powered PSUs for 1080p gaming. However i wouldnt pay £280 for which is the current price for a MSi Ventus OC on Amazon. I brought mine 9 months ago for less than half of that!

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback