Real World Speed
Performance profile from 343,224 user samples
44,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 33% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
298,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
Worst Bench: 47% Device(7377 0000) 3GB
Poor: 47% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
43.3 % 52.2 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
225 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
192 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps 147 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
159 fps 196 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+23%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps 154 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps Better peak texture detail.
+23%
215 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps 154 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
182 fps 210 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 168 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 150 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+8%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps 98 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+18%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 65 fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+13%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 60 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+22%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps 148 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+10%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 100 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+13%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 55 fps Slightly Better BF1 Fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 51 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+5%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
109 fps 206 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+89%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 fps 115 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+20%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 60 fps Better WoW Fps.
+22%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 95 fps Better WoT Fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,579 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % 1.95 % Hugely higher market share.
+572%
Value
Value For Money
81.7 % Slightly better value.
+12%
72.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % 104 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$126 Cheaper.
+26%
$170
Age
Newest
39 Months 39 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps 218 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+14%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
173 fps 189 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
155 fps 202 fps Much better lighting effects.
+30%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
163 fps 174 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback