Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 721,823 user samples
94,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 32% XFX(1682 9470)
Poor: 32% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 151st / 713
627,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 48% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 123rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
39.5 % 52 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
47.5 fps 63.8 fps Much better lighting effects.
+34%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
56.5 fps 68.3 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
57.1 fps 65.2 fps Faster multi rendering.
+14%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
55.2 fps 66 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
60.1 fps 68.7 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
59.9 fps 96.2 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+61%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
60.7 fps 68.5 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+13%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
64.6 fps 70.3 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 Fps 150 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+7%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
84 Fps 98 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+17%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 Fps 64 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+21%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 Fps 60 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+22%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps 148 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+12%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps 100 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+14%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 Fps 55 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 Fps 51 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+7%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
109 Fps 184 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+68%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 Fps 116 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+20%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 Fps 61 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+22%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 95 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 68,775,158 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.09 % 0.83 % Hugely higher market share.
+822%
Value
Value For Money
74.7 % 107 % Much better value.
+43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
61 % 66 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$126 $115 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
Age
Newest
99 Months 99 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
80.2 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
66.6 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
44.1 fps 65.1 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+48%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
69.5 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
60.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
42.2 fps 60.2 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+43%

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only have three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback